![]() ![]() ![]() I wonder how it would compare with E-Cycles? ![]() The scene has lots of details to stress, even high-end GPUs with lots of glass, glossy surfaces, and complex geometry. Do you want to see a quick comparison between Cycles and LuxCore? In a recent post at the Blender artists forums, we can watch a video produced by artist Charles Nandeya showing the same scene rendered with Cycles and LuxCore.Īs you can see from the video, we get some impressive render times with the LuxCore light cache. Things are much faster with recent developments of LuxCore and support for modern technologies such as OptiX on RTX cards. If you are an experienced artist that still remembers LuxCore from the time it was still LuxRender, you probably recall that render speeds were not a highlight. One of those options is LuxCore that delivers some impressive lighting and shaders for interiors. Today the number of options to render is much more significant with commercial and FOSS alternatives to Cycles. Should you stick with Blender’s default render or look somewhere else to faster speeds? In the past, we had limited options regarding external renders to work with Blender. A question that we often got from our readers is that Cycles is indeed the best solution for architectural interiors with Blender. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |